Carlos Larkin
On the New York attorney register since 2010 · office in New York, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 4847802
- Admitted
- 2010 · First Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Oct 2026
Carlos Larkin is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2010 in the First Department, with an office in New York, NY; next registration due Oct 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
The register gives this attorney’s employer as “Housing Preservation Development”. We count that spelling with Housing Preservation and Development, the name most registrants give for the firm now; the register does not say where the attorney works today.
3 other attorneys list Housing Preservation and Development or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 1 of them was admitted before 2010, and all 4 give an office in New York, NY. The 3 whose admission is closest to 2010, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Mona Liza Fabular Lao | 2003 | Currently registered |
| Demetrios Mestousis | 2013 | Currently registered |
| Daphne Amalia Rubin-Vega | 2016 | Currently registered |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Carlos Larkin studied at Harvard Law School (the register spells it “HARVARD”). 3,482 of its 14,378 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2010s, as Carlos Larkin was.
- Same law school
- 14,378living graduates; 86.1% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in New York, NY
- 93,604living registrants
Of the 93,604 living registrants with an office in New York, NY, 47,610 were admitted before 2010 and 43,603 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Harvard Law School graduates on the register14,378 living, 86.1% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in New York, NY93,604 living registrants give an office there.
- New York County’s registered bar75,989 currently registered, 46.63 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 201010,128 people admitted in 2010 are on the register, 3,126 of them through the First Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Carlos Larkin’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, First Department, which admitted Carlos Larkin in 2010. A complaint about this attorney would go to the First Department’s grievance committee, which covers New York County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).