Christopher Richard Froeb
On the New York attorney register since 2006 · office in Boston, MA
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 4403010
- Admitted
- 2006 · Third Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Sep 2026
Christopher Richard Froeb is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2006 in the Third Department, with an office in Boston, MA; next registration due Sep 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
281 other attorneys list Nixon Peabody LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 116 of them were admitted before 2006, and 33 of the 282 give an office in Boston, MA. The 5 whose admission is closest to 2006, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Linn Berrios | 2006 | Currently registered |
| Erik Anthony Goergen | 2006 | Currently registered |
| Suzanne Anastasia Harrington-Steppen | 2006 | Currently registered |
| Thomas Michael Mealiffe | 2006 | Currently registered |
| Ruben Manuel Ravago | 2006 | Due to re‑register |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Christopher Richard Froeb studied at Suffolk University Law School (the register spells it “SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW”). 440 of its 1,901 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2000s, as Christopher Richard Froeb was.
- Same law school
- 1,901living graduates; 85.3% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Boston, MA
- 2,932living registrants (outside New York State)
Of the 2,932 living registrants with an office in Boston, MA, 1,059 were admitted before 2006 and 1,789 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Nixon Peabody LLP282 on the register, 116 of the others admitted before 2006; 33 of the 282 give an office in Boston, MA.
- Suffolk University Law School graduates on the register1,901 living, 85.3% registered; 6 of them list Nixon Peabody LLP.
- New York-admitted attorneys in Boston, MA2,932 living registrants give an office there.
- Admitted in 20068,638 people admitted in 2006 are on the register, 2,950 of them through the Third Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Christopher Richard Froeb’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Third Department, which admitted Christopher Richard Froeb in 2006. The register places the office outside New York, so a complaint would go to that department’s grievance committee (22 NYCRR 1240.7(a)(2)).
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).