Daniel Petigrow
On the New York attorney register since 1990 · office in Hopewell Junction, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 2348399
- Admitted
- 1990 · Second Department
- Status
- Currently registered
- Next registration
- Jul 2028
Daniel Petigrow is currently registered on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1990 in the Second Department, with an office in Hopewell Junction, NY; next registration due Jul 2028. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Currently registered” means Daniel Petigrow has filed the biennial registration the court system requires; the next one is due in Jul 2028.
- Due to re‑register to Currently registered the routine two-year cycle: the registration window closed with a filing
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Due to re‑register the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
13 other attorneys list Thomas, Drohan, Waxman & Petigrow LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 1 of them was admitted before 1990, and 11 of the 14 give an office in Hopewell Junction, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1990, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| James P. Drohan | 1983 | Currently registered |
| Nina Massen | 1994 | Currently registered |
| Steven Leon Banks | 1996 | Currently registered |
| Aimee Beth Katona | 2003 | Currently registered |
| Neelanjan Choudhury | 2006 | Currently registered |
All 14 registrations that list Thomas, Drohan, Waxman & Petigrow LLP
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Daniel Petigrow studied at Fordham University School of Law (the register spells it “FORDHAM”). 3,687 of its 20,418 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1990s, as Daniel Petigrow was.
- Same law school
- 20,418living graduates; 87.9% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Hopewell Junction, NY
- 54living registrants
Of the 54 living registrants with an office in Hopewell Junction, NY, 19 were admitted before 1990 and 33 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Thomas, Drohan, Waxman & Petigrow LLP14 on the register, 1 of the others admitted before 1990; 11 of the 14 give an office in Hopewell Junction, NY.
- Fordham University School of Law graduates on the register20,418 living, 87.9% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in Hopewell Junction, NY54 living registrants give an office there.
- Dutchess County’s registered bar754 currently registered, 2.53 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 19906,112 people admitted in 1990 are on the register, 2,199 of them through the Second Department.
- Every registration that reads “Currently registered”286,911 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Daniel Petigrow’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Second Department, which admitted Daniel Petigrow in 1990. A complaint about this attorney would go to the Second Department’s Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, which covers Dutchess County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).