Donald Frank
On the New York attorney register since 1969 · office in New York, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 1445683
- Admitted
- 1969 · Second Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Mar 2026
Donald Frank is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1969 in the Second Department, with an office in New York, NY; next registration due Mar 2026. The status is the same in all 3 files we hold. The registration was due in Mar 2026 and the register has not recorded it as filed.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Due to re‑register the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
266 other attorneys list Blank Rome LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 7 of them were admitted before 1969, and 195 of the 267 give an office in New York, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1969, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Frederick L. Ikenson | 1968 | Due to re‑register |
| Ira H. Polon | 1968 | Currently registered |
| Jeffrey Norton Siegel | 1968 | Due to re‑register |
| Frederick M. Lowther | 1969 | Currently registered |
| Sheila Ginsberg Riesel | 1969 | Due to re‑register |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Donald Frank studied at New York Law School. 328 of its 15,601 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1960s, as Donald Frank was.
- Same law school
- 15,601living graduates; 87.0% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in New York, NY
- 93,604living registrants
Of the 93,604 living registrants with an office in New York, NY, 1,092 were admitted before 1969 and 92,310 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Blank Rome LLP267 on the register, 7 of the others admitted before 1969; 195 of the 267 give an office in New York, NY.
- New York Law School graduates on the register15,601 living, 87.0% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in New York, NY93,604 living registrants give an office there.
- New York County’s registered bar75,989 currently registered, 46.63 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 19691,864 people admitted in 1969 are on the register, 938 of them through the Second Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Donald Frank’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Second Department, which admitted Donald Frank in 1969. A complaint about this attorney would go to the First Department’s grievance committee, which covers New York County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).