Erik Arthur Ortmann
On the New York attorney register since 1995 · office in Woodbury, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 2669208
- Admitted
- 1995 · Second Department
- Status
- Currently registered
- Next registration
- Nov 2027
Erik Arthur Ortmann is currently registered on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1995 in the Second Department, with an office in Woodbury, NY; next registration due Nov 2027. The status is the same in all 3 files we hold.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Currently registered” means Erik Arthur Ortmann has filed the biennial registration the court system requires; the next one is due in Nov 2027.
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
The register gives this attorney’s employer as “Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP”. We count that spelling with Kaufman Dolowich LLP, the name most registrants give for the firm now; the register does not say where the attorney works today.
102 other attorneys list Kaufman Dolowich LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 23 of them were admitted before 1995, and 33 of the 103 give an office in Woodbury, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1995, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ivan Jay Dolowich | 1993 | Currently registered |
| Steven Campbell Cramer | 1994 | Currently registered |
| Michael Vincent De Santis | 1994 | Currently registered |
| David J. Kuffler | 1996 | Currently registered |
| Keith Jason Gutstein | 1997 | Currently registered |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Erik Arthur Ortmann studied at Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (the register spells it “HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY”). 2,255 of its 11,234 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1990s, as Erik Arthur Ortmann was.
- Same law school
- 11,234living graduates; 92.1% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Woodbury, NY
- 398living registrants
Of the 398 living registrants with an office in Woodbury, NY, 132 were admitted before 1995 and 255 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Kaufman Dolowich LLP103 on the register, 23 of the others admitted before 1995; 33 of the 103 give an office in Woodbury, NY.
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University graduates on the register11,234 living, 92.1% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in Woodbury, NY398 living registrants give an office there.
- Nassau County’s registered bar9,622 currently registered, 6.92 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 19956,807 people admitted in 1995 are on the register, 2,554 of them through the Second Department.
- Every registration that reads “Currently registered”286,911 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Erik Arthur Ortmann’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Second Department, which admitted Erik Arthur Ortmann in 1995. A complaint about this attorney would go to the Second Department’s Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, which covers Nassau County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).