Glen Thomas Pewarski
On the New York attorney register since 1981 · office in Central Islip, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 2575611
- Admitted
- 1981 · Third Department
- Status
- Delinquent
- Next registration
- Sep 2026
Glen Thomas Pewarski is delinquent on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1981 in the Third Department, with an office in Central Islip, NY; next registration due Sep 2026. The status is the same in all 3 files we hold. The month shown is the next cycle’s; the delinquency concerns an earlier registration the register did not receive.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Delinquent” means the attorney has a registration the register shows as due and not received. Under the rule a failure to register results in referral to the Appellate Division for disciplinary action; the register does not show whether a given attorney was referred.
- Delinquent unchanged
- Delinquent unchanged
- Delinquent the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
27 other attorneys list Bartlett LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 2 of them were admitted before 1981, and 2 of the 28 give an office in Central Islip, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1981, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Brian E. Lee | 1977 | Currently registered |
| Leland Neil Garbus | 1982 | Currently registered |
| Grace Carreras McCallen | 1986 | Currently registered |
| Louis Stephen Tassan | 1986 | Due to re‑register |
| John Patrick Koester | 1988 | Currently registered |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Glen Thomas Pewarski studied at Notre Dame Law School (the register spells it “NOTRE DAME”). 129 of its 1,384 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1980s, as Glen Thomas Pewarski was.
- Same law school
- 1,384living graduates; 88.9% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Central Islip, NY
- 444living registrants
Of the 444 living registrants with an office in Central Islip, NY, 28 were admitted before 1981 and 408 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Bartlett LLP28 on the register, 2 of the others admitted before 1981; 2 of the 28 give an office in Central Islip, NY.
- Notre Dame Law School graduates on the register1,384 living, 88.9% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in Central Islip, NY444 living registrants give an office there.
- Suffolk County’s registered bar5,823 currently registered, 3.81 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 19814,916 people admitted in 1981 are on the register, 837 of them through the Third Department.
- Every registration that reads “Delinquent”15,500 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- How to complain about a New York lawyerThe grievance committee for each county, and what it can do.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Glen Thomas Pewarski’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Third Department, which admitted Glen Thomas Pewarski in 1981. A complaint about this attorney would go to the Second Department’s Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, which covers Suffolk County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).