Gregory Sarkis Kinoian
On the New York attorney register since 1992 · office in New York, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 2464063
- Admitted
- 1992 · First Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Jan 2026
Gregory Sarkis Kinoian is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1992 in the First Department, with an office in New York, NY; next registration due Jan 2026. The status is the same in all 3 files we hold. The registration was due in Jan 2026 and the register has not recorded it as filed.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Due to re‑register the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
27 other attorneys list Genova Burns LLC or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 5 of them were admitted before 1992, and 8 of the 28 give an office in New York, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1992, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| David Perry Cooke | 1987 | Currently registered |
| Celia Susan Bosco | 1993 | Currently registered |
| Michael Harris Freeman | 1993 | Currently registered |
| Christine Ann Soto | 1993 | Currently registered |
| Judith Rebecca Kramer | 1994 | Due to re‑register |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Gregory Sarkis Kinoian studied at Brooklyn Law School. 3,720 of its 20,058 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1990s, as Gregory Sarkis Kinoian was.
- Same law school
- 20,058living graduates; 86.6% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in New York, NY
- 93,604living registrants
Of the 93,604 living registrants with an office in New York, NY, 16,207 were admitted before 1992 and 76,145 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Genova Burns LLC28 on the register, 5 of the others admitted before 1992; 8 of the 28 give an office in New York, NY.
- Brooklyn Law School graduates on the register20,058 living, 86.6% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in New York, NY93,604 living registrants give an office there.
- New York County’s registered bar75,989 currently registered, 46.63 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 19926,498 people admitted in 1992 are on the register, 2,198 of them through the First Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Gregory Sarkis Kinoian’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, First Department, which admitted Gregory Sarkis Kinoian in 1992. A complaint about this attorney would go to the First Department’s grievance committee, which covers New York County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).