Jaime Francisco Cardenas-Navia
On the New York attorney register since 2014 · office in New York, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 5249248
- Admitted
- 2014 · Second Department
- Status
- Currently registered
- Next registration
- Aug 2028
Jaime Francisco Cardenas-Navia is currently registered on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2014 in the Second Department, with an office in New York, NY. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Currently registered” means Jaime Francisco Cardenas-Navia has filed the biennial registration the court system requires; the next one is due in Aug 2028.
- Due to re‑register to Currently registered the routine two-year cycle: the registration window closed with a filing
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Due to re‑register the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
17 other attorneys list Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 8 of them were admitted before 2014, and 13 of the 18 give an office in New York, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 2014, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Robert Colsher | 2011 | Currently registered |
| Sean Michael McCarthy | 2014 | Due to re‑register |
| Adam Jacob Adler | 2016 | Currently registered |
| Michael James Xavier Matulewicz -Crowley | 2016 | Due to re‑register |
| Michael Martin Polka | 2017 | Currently registered |
All 18 registrations that list Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Jaime Francisco Cardenas-Navia studied at Georgetown University Law Center. 3,165 of its 11,562 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2010s, as Jaime Francisco Cardenas-Navia was.
- Same law school
- 11,562living graduates; 87.9% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in New York, NY
- 93,604living registrants
Of the 93,604 living registrants with an office in New York, NY, 57,082 were admitted before 2014 and 33,603 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP18 on the register, 8 of the others admitted before 2014; 13 of the 18 give an office in New York, NY.
- Georgetown University Law Center graduates on the register11,562 living, 87.9% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in New York, NY93,604 living registrants give an office there.
- New York County’s registered bar75,989 currently registered, 46.63 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 201410,747 people admitted in 2014 are on the register, 2,930 of them through the Second Department.
- Every registration that reads “Currently registered”286,911 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Jaime Francisco Cardenas-Navia’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Second Department, which admitted Jaime Francisco Cardenas-Navia in 2014. A complaint about this attorney would go to the First Department’s grievance committee, which covers New York County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).