James Ross Eustis
On the New York attorney register since 1973 · office in New York, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 1019314
- Admitted
- 1973 · First Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Oct 2026
James Ross Eustis is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1973 in the First Department, with an office in New York, NY; next registration due Oct 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
53 other attorneys list Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 0 of them were admitted before 1973, and 41 of the 54 give an office in New York, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1973, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Steven I. Turner | 1973 | Currently registered |
| Eric Scott Petersen | 1974 | Due to re‑register |
| Richard A. Vandusen | 1975 | Due to re‑register |
| Arthur Michael Cohen | 1976 | Currently registered |
| Clarke Steven Donovan | 1977 | Due to re‑register |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
James Ross Eustis studied at Vanderbilt University Law School (the register spells it “VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY”). 70 of its 1,752 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1970s, as James Ross Eustis was.
- Same law school
- 1,752living graduates; 88.8% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in New York, NY
- 93,604living registrants
Of the 93,604 living registrants with an office in New York, NY, 1,883 were admitted before 1973 and 91,439 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP54 on the register, 0 of the others admitted before 1973; 41 of the 54 give an office in New York, NY.
- Vanderbilt University Law School graduates on the register1,752 living, 88.8% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in New York, NY93,604 living registrants give an office there.
- New York County’s registered bar75,989 currently registered, 46.63 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 19732,460 people admitted in 1973 are on the register, 907 of them through the First Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of James Ross Eustis’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, First Department, which admitted James Ross Eustis in 1973. A complaint about this attorney would go to the First Department’s grievance committee, which covers New York County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).