Jill Novak Dalrymple
On the New York attorney register since 2002 · office in Nashville, TN
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 4023677
- Admitted
- 2002 · Third Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Oct 2026
Jill Novak Dalrymple is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2002 in the Third Department, with an office in Nashville, TN; next registration due Oct 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
The register gives this attorney’s employer as “Fisher Phillips LLP”. We count that spelling with Fisher & Phillips LLP, the name most registrants give for the firm now; the register does not say where the attorney works today.
76 other attorneys list Fisher & Phillips LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 11 of them were admitted before 2002. The 5 whose admission is closest to 2002, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Marko C. Maglich | 2000 | Currently registered |
| Kevin Richard Brady | 2001 | Currently registered |
| Christopher James Schulte | 2001 | Currently registered |
| Jocelyn Christine Campanaro | 2003 | Due to re‑register |
| Brian Jeffrey Gershengorn | 2004 | Currently registered |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Jill Novak Dalrymple studied at Albany Law School. 1,952 of its 10,183 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2000s, as Jill Novak Dalrymple was.
- Same law school
- 10,183living graduates; 91.3% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Nashville, TN
- 329living registrants (outside New York State)
Of the 329 living registrants with an office in Nashville, TN, 63 were admitted before 2002 and 257 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Fisher & Phillips LLP77 on the register, 11 of the others admitted before 2002.
- Albany Law School graduates on the register10,183 living, 91.3% registered.
- New York-admitted attorneys in Nashville, TN329 living registrants give an office there.
- Admitted in 20027,981 people admitted in 2002 are on the register, 2,250 of them through the Third Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Jill Novak Dalrymple’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Third Department, which admitted Jill Novak Dalrymple in 2002. The register places the office outside New York, so a complaint would go to that department’s grievance committee (22 NYCRR 1240.7(a)(2)).
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).