John Frederick Harwick
On the New York attorney register since 1996 · office in Albany, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 2726768
- Admitted
- 1996 · Third Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Nov 2026
John Frederick Harwick is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1996 in the Third Department, with an office in Albany, NY; next registration due Nov 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
15 other attorneys list Hacker Murphy, LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 7 of them were admitted before 1996, and 11 of the 16 give an office in Albany, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1996, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Rosemary Weaver McKenna | 1990 | Due to re‑register |
| Patrick L. Seely Jr | 1993 | Currently registered |
| Benjamin Fisher Neidl | 2001 | Currently registered |
| Thomas J. Higgs | 2003 | Currently registered |
| Meghan Rielly Keenholts | 2006 | Currently registered |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
John Frederick Harwick studied at Albany Law School. 2,261 of its 10,183 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1990s, as John Frederick Harwick was.
- Same law school
- 10,183living graduates; 91.3% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Albany, NY
- 3,678living registrants
Of the 3,678 living registrants with an office in Albany, NY, 982 were admitted before 1996 and 2,627 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Hacker Murphy, LLP16 on the register, 7 of the others admitted before 1996; 11 of the 16 give an office in Albany, NY.
- Albany Law School graduates on the register10,183 living, 91.3% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in Albany, NY3,678 living registrants give an office there.
- Albany County’s registered bar3,767 currently registered, 11.88 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 19966,887 people admitted in 1996 are on the register, 1,621 of them through the Third Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of John Frederick Harwick’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Third Department, which admitted John Frederick Harwick in 1996. A complaint about this attorney would go to the Third Department’s grievance committee, which covers Albany County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).