Kartik Khanna
On the New York attorney register since 2018 · office in New York, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 5571807
- Admitted
- 2018 · Third Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Oct 2026
Kartik Khanna is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2018 in the Third Department, with an office in New York, NY; next registration due Oct 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
1,463 other attorneys list Kirkland & Ellis LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 612 of them were admitted before 2018, and 959 of the 1,464 give an office in New York, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 2018, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Paul Alcan | 2018 | Currently registered |
| Alsharefaruba Alharthi | 2018 | Currently registered |
| Leia Pearl Andrew | 2018 | Currently registered |
| Samuel Norman Ash | 2018 | Currently registered |
| Holt Pitcher Baker | 2018 | Due to re‑register |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Kartik Khanna studied at Harvard Law School. 3,482 of its 14,378 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2010s, as Kartik Khanna was.
- Same law school
- 14,378living graduates; 86.1% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in New York, NY
- 93,604living registrants
Of the 93,604 living registrants with an office in New York, NY, 67,522 were admitted before 2018 and 23,370 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Kirkland & Ellis LLP1,464 on the register, 612 of the others admitted before 2018; 959 of the 1,464 give an office in New York, NY.
- Harvard Law School graduates on the register14,378 living, 86.1% registered; 123 of them list Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
- Attorneys with an office in New York, NY93,604 living registrants give an office there.
- New York County’s registered bar75,989 currently registered, 46.63 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 20188,750 people admitted in 2018 are on the register, 3,556 of them through the Third Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Kartik Khanna’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Third Department, which admitted Kartik Khanna in 2018. A complaint about this attorney would go to the First Department’s grievance committee, which covers New York County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).