Katherine Carol Den Bleyker
On the New York attorney register since 2008 · office in Los Angeles, CA
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 4600698
- Admitted
- 2008 · First Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Nov 2026
Katherine Carol Den Bleyker is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2008 in the First Department, with an office in Los Angeles, CA; next registration due Nov 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
28 other attorneys list O’Hagan Meyer or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 12 of them were admitted before 2008, and 3 of the 29 give an office in Los Angeles, CA. The 5 whose admission is closest to 2008, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Samuel Youngs Edgerton III | 2007 | Currently registered |
| Tamara S. Grimm | 2007 | Currently registered |
| Theodore Clarke Peters | 2007 | Currently registered |
| Christopher Michael Fox | 2009 | Suspended, delinquent |
| Nicole Zachar Davidson | 2010 | Due to re‑register |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Katherine Carol Den Bleyker studied at Fordham University School of Law (the register spells it “FORDHAM”). 4,485 of its 20,418 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2000s, as Katherine Carol Den Bleyker was.
- Same law school
- 20,418living graduates; 87.9% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Los Angeles, CA
- 2,891living registrants (outside New York State)
Of the 2,891 living registrants with an office in Los Angeles, CA, 1,319 were admitted before 2008 and 1,479 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists O’Hagan Meyer29 on the register, 12 of the others admitted before 2008; 3 of the 29 give an office in Los Angeles, CA.
- Fordham University School of Law graduates on the register20,418 living, 87.9% registered.
- New York-admitted attorneys in Los Angeles, CA2,891 living registrants give an office there.
- Admitted in 20089,683 people admitted in 2008 are on the register, 3,620 of them through the First Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Katherine Carol Den Bleyker’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, First Department, which admitted Katherine Carol Den Bleyker in 2008. The register places the office outside New York, so a complaint would go to that department’s grievance committee (22 NYCRR 1240.7(a)(2)).
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).