Mark I. Fishman
On the New York attorney register since 1972 · office in New Haven, CT
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 1065929
- Admitted
- 1972 · First Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Sep 2026
Mark I. Fishman is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1972 in the First Department, with an office in New Haven, CT; next registration due Sep 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
The register gives this attorney’s employer as “Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, PC”. We count that spelling with Neubert Pepe & Monteith, P.C., the name most registrants give for the firm now; the register does not say where the attorney works today.
13 other attorneys list Neubert Pepe & Monteith, P.C. or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 0 of them were admitted before 1972, and 13 of the 14 give an office in New Haven, CT. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1972, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Thomas Gradoville | 1975 | Due to re‑register |
| Douglas S. Skalka | 1986 | Due to re‑register |
| Joseph James Andriola | 1991 | Currently registered |
| Nancy Bohan Kinsella | 1992 | Currently registered |
| Simon I. Allentuch | 1994 | Suspended, delinquent |
All 14 registrations that list Neubert Pepe & Monteith, P.C.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Mark I. Fishman studied at Harvard Law School. 989 of its 14,378 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1970s, as Mark I. Fishman was.
- Same law school
- 14,378living graduates; 86.1% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in New Haven, CT
- 429living registrants (outside New York State)
Of the 429 living registrants with an office in New Haven, CT, 5 were admitted before 1972 and 422 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Neubert Pepe & Monteith, P.C.14 on the register, 0 of the others admitted before 1972; 13 of the 14 give an office in New Haven, CT.
- Harvard Law School graduates on the register14,378 living, 86.1% registered.
- New York-admitted attorneys in New Haven, CT429 living registrants give an office there.
- Admitted in 19721,983 people admitted in 1972 are on the register, 651 of them through the First Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Mark I. Fishman’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, First Department, which admitted Mark I. Fishman in 1972. The register places the office outside New York, so a complaint would go to that department’s grievance committee (22 NYCRR 1240.7(a)(2)).
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).