Mary F. Thurber
On the New York attorney register since 1986 · office in Hackensack, NJ
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 2036218
- Admitted
- 1986 · Third Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Nov 2026
Mary F. Thurber is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1986 in the Third Department, with an office in Hackensack, NJ; next registration due Nov 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
56 other attorneys list Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, P.C. or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 10 of them were admitted before 1986, and 51 of the 57 give an office in Hackensack, NJ. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1986, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce Jay Ackerman | 1983 | Currently registered |
| Raymond Miller Brown | 1983 | Delinquent |
| Joseph Louis Goldman | 1984 | Currently registered |
| Aidan Patrick O’Connor | 1987 | Currently registered |
| Cynthia Martins | 1990 | Currently registered |
All 57 registrations that list Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, P.C.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Mary F. Thurber studied at Rutgers Law School (the register spells it “RUTGERS NJ”). 1,079 of its 7,506 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1980s, as Mary F. Thurber was.
- Same law school
- 7,506living graduates; 84.1% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Hackensack, NJ
- 684living registrants (outside New York State)
Of the 684 living registrants with an office in Hackensack, NJ, 95 were admitted before 1986 and 582 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, P.C.57 on the register, 10 of the others admitted before 1986; 51 of the 57 give an office in Hackensack, NJ.
- Rutgers Law School graduates on the register7,506 living, 84.1% registered; 15 of them list Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, P.C..
- New York-admitted attorneys in Hackensack, NJ684 living registrants give an office there.
- Admitted in 19866,111 people admitted in 1986 are on the register, 1,107 of them through the Third Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Mary F. Thurber’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Third Department, which admitted Mary F. Thurber in 1986. The register places the office outside New York, so a complaint would go to that department’s grievance committee (22 NYCRR 1240.7(a)(2)).
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).