Matthew E. Moloshok
On the New York attorney register since 1979 · office in Roseland, NJ
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 1281286
- Admitted
- 1979 · First Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Nov 2026
Matthew E. Moloshok is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1979 in the First Department, with an office in Roseland, NJ; next registration due Nov 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
13 other attorneys list Hellring Lindeman Goldstein & Siegal LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 4 of them were admitted before 1979, and all 14 give an office in Roseland, NJ. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1979, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen Lawrence Dreyfuss | 1975 | Currently registered |
| Judah Isaac Elstein | 1981 | Currently registered |
| Margaret Dee Hellring | 1981 | Currently registered |
| Charles Oransky | 1981 | Currently registered |
| Robert S. Raymar | 1982 | Due to re‑register |
All 14 registrations that list Hellring Lindeman Goldstein & Siegal LLP
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Matthew E. Moloshok studied at George Washington University Law School (the register spells it “GEORGE WASHINGTON U”). 292 of its 6,333 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1970s, as Matthew E. Moloshok was.
- Same law school
- 6,333living graduates; 88.8% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Roseland, NJ
- 685living registrants (outside New York State)
Of the 685 living registrants with an office in Roseland, NJ, 17 were admitted before 1979 and 660 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Hellring Lindeman Goldstein & Siegal LLP14 on the register, 4 of the others admitted before 1979; all 14 give an office in Roseland, NJ.
- George Washington University Law School graduates on the register6,333 living, 88.8% registered.
- New York-admitted attorneys in Roseland, NJ685 living registrants give an office there.
- Admitted in 19793,974 people admitted in 1979 are on the register, 1,513 of them through the First Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Matthew E. Moloshok’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, First Department, which admitted Matthew E. Moloshok in 1979. The register places the office outside New York, so a complaint would go to that department’s grievance committee (22 NYCRR 1240.7(a)(2)).
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).