Nancy Ann McKinley
On the New York attorney register since 1998 · office in Rochester, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 2862753
- Admitted
- 1998 · Fourth Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Nov 2026
Nancy Ann McKinley is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 1998 in the Fourth Department, with an office in Rochester, NY; next registration due Nov 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
21 other attorneys list Lacy Katzen LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 10 of them were admitted before 1998, and 21 of the 22 give an office in Rochester, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 1998, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Stephen Bryson | 1992 | Currently registered |
| Joanne Constantino | 1992 | Currently registered |
| Jacqueline Marie Thomas | 1992 | Currently registered |
| Matthew Adam Ryen | 1997 | Currently registered |
| Nathan A Shoff | 2007 | Currently registered |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Nancy Ann McKinley studied at University at Buffalo School of Law (SUNY) (the register spells it “SUNY BUFFALO”). 1,970 of its 9,828 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 1990s, as Nancy Ann McKinley was.
- Same law school
- 9,828living graduates; 90.9% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Rochester, NY
- 2,353living registrants
Of the 2,353 living registrants with an office in Rochester, NY, 930 were admitted before 1998 and 1,368 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Lacy Katzen LLP22 on the register, 10 of the others admitted before 1998; 21 of the 22 give an office in Rochester, NY.
- University at Buffalo School of Law (SUNY) graduates on the register9,828 living, 90.9% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in Rochester, NY2,353 living registrants give an office there.
- Monroe County’s registered bar2,430 currently registered, 3.22 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 19987,302 people admitted in 1998 are on the register, 381 of them through the Fourth Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Nancy Ann McKinley’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which admitted Nancy Ann McKinley in 1998. A complaint about this attorney would go to the Fourth Department’s grievance committee, which covers Monroe County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).