Patrick John Caulfield
On the New York attorney register since 2010 · office in New York, NY
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 4828901
- Admitted
- 2010 · Second Department
- Status
- Currently registered
- Next registration
- Jul 2028
Patrick John Caulfield is currently registered on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2010 in the Second Department, with an office in New York, NY; next registration due Jul 2028. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Currently registered” means Patrick John Caulfield has filed the biennial registration the court system requires; the next one is due in Jul 2028.
- Currently registered unchanged
- Due to re‑register to Currently registered the routine two-year cycle: the registration window closed with a filing
- Due to re‑register the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
27 other attorneys list Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 23 of them were admitted before 2010, and 22 of the 28 give an office in New York, NY. The 5 whose admission is closest to 2010, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Amanda Mary Hektor | 2004 | Suspended, delinquent |
| Neil Scott Helfand | 2004 | Currently registered |
| Jordan Charles Kahn | 2009 | Currently registered |
| Brandon Michael Petelin | 2009 | Currently registered |
| Eve Qiwei Wang | 2009 | Currently registered |
All 28 registrations that list Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Patrick John Caulfield studied at St. John’s University School of Law (the register spells it “ST. JOHN'S UNIVERSITY”). 2,484 of its 15,595 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2010s, as Patrick John Caulfield was.
- Same law school
- 15,595living graduates; 88.6% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in New York, NY
- 93,604living registrants
Of the 93,604 living registrants with an office in New York, NY, 47,610 were admitted before 2010 and 43,603 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP28 on the register, 23 of the others admitted before 2010; 22 of the 28 give an office in New York, NY.
- St. John’s University School of Law graduates on the register15,595 living, 88.6% registered.
- Attorneys with an office in New York, NY93,604 living registrants give an office there.
- New York County’s registered bar75,989 currently registered, 46.63 per 1,000 residents.
- Admitted in 201010,128 people admitted in 2010 are on the register, 2,711 of them through the Second Department.
- Every registration that reads “Currently registered”286,911 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Patrick John Caulfield’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Second Department, which admitted Patrick John Caulfield in 2010. A complaint about this attorney would go to the First Department’s grievance committee, which covers New York County, where the register places the office.
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).