Paven Malhotra
On the New York attorney register since 2006 · office in San Francisco, CA
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 4409397
- Admitted
- 2006 · Third Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Oct 2026
Paven Malhotra is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2006 in the Third Department, with an office in San Francisco, CA; next registration due Oct 2026. Since Jul 3, 2026 it has moved only through the routine two-year cycle.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Currently registered to Due to re‑register the routine two-year cycle: the registration window opened
- Currently registered unchanged
- Currently registered the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
14 other attorneys list Keker, van Nest & Peters LLP or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 3 of them were admitted before 2006, and all 15 give an office in San Francisco, CA. The 5 whose admission is closest to 2006, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Laurie Carr Mims | 2003 | Currently registered |
| Reid Patrick Mullen | 2010 | Currently registered |
| Benjamin David Rothstein | 2010 | Currently registered |
| Anjali Srinivasan | 2012 | Due to re‑register |
| Candice Mai Khanh Nguyen | 2016 | Currently registered |
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Paven Malhotra studied at Harvard Law School. 3,057 of its 14,378 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2000s, as Paven Malhotra was.
- Same law school
- 14,378living graduates; 86.1% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in San Francisco, CA
- 2,474living registrants (outside New York State)
Of the 2,474 living registrants with an office in San Francisco, CA, 867 were admitted before 2006 and 1,537 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Keker, van Nest & Peters LLP15 on the register, 3 of the others admitted before 2006; all 15 give an office in San Francisco, CA.
- Harvard Law School graduates on the register14,378 living, 86.1% registered.
- New York-admitted attorneys in San Francisco, CA2,474 living registrants give an office there.
- Admitted in 20068,638 people admitted in 2006 are on the register, 2,950 of them through the Third Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Paven Malhotra’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Third Department, which admitted Paven Malhotra in 2006. The register places the office outside New York, so a complaint would go to that department’s grievance committee (22 NYCRR 1240.7(a)(2)).
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).