Rachel Tamar Maida
On the New York attorney register since 2006 · office in Irvine, CA
PlainAttorney’s reading of the public register file, not a court record.
- Registration No.
- 4369278
- Admitted
- 2006 · Second Department
- Status
- Due to re‑register
- Next registration
- Feb 2026
Rachel Tamar Maida is due to re‑register on the New York attorney register file of Sep 29, 2026. Admitted in 2006 in the Second Department, with an office in Irvine, CA; next registration due Feb 2026. The status is the same in all 3 files we hold. The registration was due in Feb 2026 and the register has not recorded it as filed.
What this status means on the register
On the register, “Due to re‑register” means the attorney has a biennial registration falling due or overdue: the rule asks for it within 30 days after the attorney’s birthday in each alternate year, and the record gives the month it is due. The value stays until the register records the filing or marks the registration delinquent, so the month can have passed; by itself it is not a finding.
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Due to re‑register unchanged
- Due to re‑register the first file we hold
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; the Jul 3, 2026 and Aug 6, 2026 files for the history.
Others who list this employer on the register
252 other attorneys list Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani or one of its other names as their employer on the register; 65 of them were admitted before 2006. The 5 whose admission is closest to 2006, earliest first:
| Attorney | Admitted | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Michelle Molinaro Burke | 2006 | Currently registered |
| Elizabeth Frances Lorell | 2006 | Currently registered |
| Brian Edward Middlebrook | 2006 | Currently registered |
| Keith James Murphy | 2006 | Due to re‑register |
| Ryan James Sestack | 2006 | Currently registered |
All 253 registrations that list Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; employer spellings merged (methodology).
Where this record sits on the register
Rachel Tamar Maida studied at Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (the register spells it “Touro College Fuchsberg Law Center”). 1,565 of its 6,308 living graduates on the register were admitted in the 2000s, as Rachel Tamar Maida was.
- Same law school
- 6,308living graduates; 92.5% registered (current or due), against 87.1% overall
- Office in Irvine, CA
- 344living registrants (outside New York State)
Of the 344 living registrants with an office in Irvine, CA, 140 were admitted before 2006 and 196 after.
Source: NY Office of Court Administration, attorney registration file (data.ny.gov, dataset eqw2-r5nb), downloaded Sep 29, 2026; living registrants only.
Questions this record leads to
- Everyone who lists Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani253 on the register, 65 of the others admitted before 2006.
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center graduates on the register6,308 living, 92.5% registered.
- New York-admitted attorneys in Irvine, CA344 living registrants give an office there.
- Admitted in 20068,638 people admitted in 2006 are on the register, 2,271 of them through the Second Department.
- Every registration that reads “Due to re‑register”47,986 on the register file of Sep 29, 2026, by decade of admission.
- What a New York lawyer may chargeThe court rules on fees, retainers and fee disputes, each cited.
How to confirm it officially
For a statement of Rachel Tamar Maida’s standing, contact the Attorney Registration Unit of the NY Office of Court Administration (nycourts.gov/attorneys), or ask the Appellate Division, Second Department, which admitted Rachel Tamar Maida in 2006. The register places the office outside New York, so a complaint would go to that department’s grievance committee (22 NYCRR 1240.7(a)(2)).
This page reads the register file of Sep 29, 2026, and the court system’s own search can be newer; the register shows only the current value, so a suspension that ended before the files we hold, or a censure, leaves no trace here (Appellate Division decisions are published through the court system’s Law Reporting Bureau).